Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from pepeasy.pep-web.org.  You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:

On IOS:

  1. Tap on the share icon  Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Wallace, E.R. (1982-83). The Repetition Compulsion. Psychoanal. Rev., 69(4):455-469.

(1982-83). Psychoanalytic Review, 69(4):455-469

The Repetition Compulsion

Edwin R. Wallace, Ph.D.

Ideas, no less than other human behaviors, are overdetermined. This means that oftentimes they have not only multiple cognitive determinants, but multiple noncognitive, even unconscious, ones. Among Freud's most controversial tenets is the repetition compulsion, broached in Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920). It was proposed as a superordinated regulatory principle to explain certain unpleasurable repetitive phenomena that Freud felt disobeyed the pleasure principle. Intimately related to the Thanatos (death instinct) concept, it is a foundation stone of Freud's subsequent philosophy. The route by which Freud arrived at the hypothesis stands in marked contrast to his usual sober, scientific methodology and suggests the presence of strong non-cognitive factors. Ernest Jones (1957, p. 266) observed that Beyond the Pleasure Principle was “discursively written, almost as if by free associations,” and felt this indicated that the ideas were transmitted from “some personal and profound source.” Freud (1920 p. 59) himself said, in the very work in which the idea appears, that “each of us is governed … by deep rooted internal prejudices, into whose hands our speculation unwittingly plays.” In fact, Beyond the Pleasure Principle is one of several works—most notably Totem and Taboo and Moses and Monotheism—which have powerful psychodynamic determinants (Wallace, 1976, 1977).

My essay is a brief history of the internal development of the “repetition compulsion” and an attempt to discern its psychodynamic determinants. Let me say at the outset that I am not contending that the sole and sufficient explanation for Freud's hypothesis is a psychological one. He had indeed had cognitive-clinical experiences—including exposure to Nietzsche's concept of the “eternal recurrence of the same,” Fliess's “law of inevitable periodicity,” (Jones, 1957, p. 271), and contact with the repetitive, maladaptive behavior of his

- 455 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2018, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.