Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use OneNote for note taking…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can use Microsoft OneNote to take notes on PEP-Web.  OneNote has some very nice and flexible note taking capabilities.

You can take free form notes, you can copy fragments using the clipboard and paste to One Note, and Print to OneNote using the Print to One Note printer driver.  Capture from PEP-Web is somewhat limited.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Wallace, E.R. (1982-83). The Repetition Compulsion. Psychoanal. Rev., 69:455-469.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

OpenAthens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1982-83). Psychoanalytic Review, 69(4):455-469

The Repetition Compulsion

Edwin R. Wallace, Ph.D.

Ideas, no less than other human behaviors, are overdetermined. This means that oftentimes they have not only multiple cognitive determinants, but multiple noncognitive, even unconscious, ones. Among Freud's most controversial tenets is the repetition compulsion, broached in Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920). It was proposed as a superordinated regulatory principle to explain certain unpleasurable repetitive phenomena that Freud felt disobeyed the pleasure principle. Intimately related to the Thanatos (death instinct) concept, it is a foundation stone of Freud's subsequent philosophy. The route by which Freud arrived at the hypothesis stands in marked contrast to his usual sober, scientific methodology and suggests the presence of strong non-cognitive factors. Ernest Jones (1957, p. 266) observed that Beyond the Pleasure Principle was “discursively written, almost as if by free associations,” and felt this indicated that the ideas were transmitted from “some personal and profound source.” Freud (1920 p. 59) himself said, in the very work in which the idea appears, that “each of us is governed … by deep rooted internal prejudices, into whose hands our speculation unwittingly plays.” In fact, Beyond the Pleasure Principle is one of several works—most notably Totem and Taboo and Moses and Monotheism—which have powerful psychodynamic determinants (Wallace, 1976, 1977).

My essay is a brief history of the internal development of the “repetition compulsion” and an attempt to discern its psychodynamic determinants. Let me say at the outset that I am not contending that the sole and sufficient explanation for Freud's hypothesis is a psychological one. He had indeed had cognitive-clinical experiences—including exposure to Nietzsche's concept of the “eternal recurrence of the same,” Fliess's “law of inevitable periodicity,” (Jones, 1957, p. 271), and contact with the repetitive, maladaptive behavior of his

- 455 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.