Login
Althofer, B.A. (1983). Uses of Sensory Images in the Therapeutic Interaction. Psychoanal. Rev., 70:47-55.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1983). Psychoanalytic Review, 70:47-55

Uses of Sensory Images in the Therapeutic Interaction

Beth A. Althofer, Ph.D. Author Information

The following discussion of sensory imagery and countertransference forays into largely uncharted territory. Numerous investigators throughout the annals of psychoanalytic history have explored the interrelationship between empathy and countertransference or empathy and creativity. Until recently, however, few have focused upon the creative, growth-promoting potential inherent in the inevitable transference-countertransference continuum. In this paper I will address myself to the salutary aspects of focusing upon sensory imagery in clinical practice, as well as to the countertransferential dangers inherent therein.

I should like at the outset to propose and briefly elaborate upon a basic thesis, that psychoanalytic therapy is a highly creative and experimental process, involving, I would stress, a deeply personal and idiosyncratic language and interplay for each unique patient-therapist dyad. However, I feel that there is an important distinction, pertinent to this issue, to be made between psychoanalytic therapy and an aesthetic or art form.

Certainly, like the performer or artist, the creative therapist has the capacity for what Arieti (1976) would call tertiary process, or a progression in the service of the ego; he uses both primary and secondary process to create a new synthesis of thought, feeling and imagery communicable to and useful for the patient. Jacobs (1973) and Kern (1978) call our attention to the kinaesthetic sensations and sensory

—————————————

* Presented at Washington Square Institute for Psychotherapy and Mental Health, New York City, April 26, 1979. I would like to thank Dr. Ira Keisman and Lawrence Sullivan for their generative inspiration, Dr. Charlotte Kahn for her help in the preparation of this paper, and Dr. Robert Mollinger, Helen Altieri, Judith Young and Gerd Althofer for their assistance and support.

- 47 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.