Login
Eigen, M. (1983). Plea For a Measure of Abnormality. Joyce McDougall. New York: International Universities Press, 1980, 493 pp.. Psychoanal. Rev., 70:281-283.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1983). Psychoanalytic Review, 70:281-283

Plea For a Measure of Abnormality. Joyce McDougall. New York: International Universities Press, 1980, 493 pp.

Michael Eigen, Ph.D. Author Information

Joyce McDougall's work combines sensitivity and clarity in ways which, I like to think, rub off a bit on those who venture near. She seems to naturally gravitate to the most creative work of the field—most notably, Winnicott, Bion, Lacan, the Kleinians. She absorbed most of these authors before they

- 281 -

were widely known. Unlike Bion and Lacan, her work is quite accessible to the ordinary psychoanalytic reader and does not require a “translator.” She communicates in an immediate, personal way. One ought to say, also, that her work is not limited to any particular camp. It is difficult to find a creative current in the field that she does not use effectively. I am told that in Paris (she is a New Zealander who began her analytic training in London and spent most of her professional life in Paris) she is one of those rare analysts accepted by all conflicting schools.

Her work is an excellent example that it is not necessary to be “original” in order to be creative. The way she makes the best in the field her own illuminates this concept. She speaks through her own struggles and, in a quite real sense, psychoanalysis shines through her. I can strongly recommend her to beginners and experienced practitioners alike. At first glance her work may seem simple. This is an illusion. Her work is clinically subtle and precise. It is a work one can and should engage intimately, not simply with head or feelings but with both My sense of self and my knowledge

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.