Login
Freedman, N., Bucci, W. (1983). The Orthogenetic Principle and Psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Rev., 70:347-357.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1983). Psychoanalytic Review, 70:347-357

SPECIAL BOOK REVIEWS

The Orthogenetic Principle and Psychoanalysis

Norbert Freedman and Wilma Bucci Author Information

Developmental processes: heinz werners selected writings. Edited by Sybil S. Barten and Margery B. Franklin. New York: International Universities Press, Vol. 1 and 2, 1978

Unlike the characters in Pirandello's play, psychoanalysis is not in search of an author. It has had its author for the last century. But like the characters, perhaps, psychoanalysis has been in search of a conceptual schema, a model which can break its intellectual isolation and serve as an organizing frame of reference for analytic findings.

Reviewing the history of psychoanalytic thought, we can distinguish several attempts to formulate psychoanalytic concepts within an integrating framework or model drawn from another scientific domain. They have varying degrees of cogency, and all are more or less wanting. First there is the neurophysiological model marked by Freud's “Project for a Scientific Psychology”. While this approach has generally fallen into disuse, several of Freud's early concepts have recently been reexamined by Pribram and Gill (1976). Next there is the sociological or anthropological model, as revealed in Freud's “Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego” and “Civilization and its Discontents”. More recently, there have been attempts within American psychology to incorporate psychoanalytic concepts within a behavioral and associationist approach, as represented by the work of

- 347 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.