Login
Kainer, R.G. (1983). On the Distinction Between Narcissism and Will: Two Aspects of the Self. Psychoanal. Rev., 70:535-552.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1983). Psychoanalytic Review, 70:535-552

On the Distinction Between Narcissism and Will: Two Aspects of the Self

R. G. K. Kainer Author Information

Kohut's (1972) introduction on the line of development of narcissism, “independent [of the object-instinctual] line of development” (p. 363) has been of major interest to contemporary psychoanalysis. While controversy over the reconciliation of drive theory with self theory may be with us for some time to come, there is no doubt that “Kohut's contributions have been among the most fertile and stimulating in this area” (Mitchell, 1979, p. 170). Kohut's (1977) desire has been to have his work appreciated for its uniqueness. He has expressed a wish for “going it alone”—a characteristic not uncommon in the creative person and innovator. However, comparisons are inevitable as the reader seeks to integrate the new to an already familiar context and to see the present in relation to the past. For example, Kohut's non-drive related theory of the self may be seen in a “frame of reference largely object-relational or inter-personal …” (Mitchell, 1979, p. 171).

Kohut's constructs of narcissim have recently been applied by Stolorow and Atwood (1976) to the work of Otto Rank, in support of the thesis that the subjective concerns of a theorist are projected into their theory of personality. Briefly, Stolorow and Atwood have superimposed Kohut's construct of archaic grandiosity (pathological narcissism) on all of Rank's themes (including that of the creative will) in order to illustrate that Rank's work emerged from problems in the narcissistic sector of his personality. In the process, they have implied that Rank is the historical antecedent of Kohut in that his theory of will anticipated the modern concept of narcissism.

- 535 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.