Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To copy parts of an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To copy a phrase, paragraph, or large section of an article, highlight the text with the mouse and press Ctrl + C. Then to paste it, go to your text editor and press Ctrl + V.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Lowental, U. (1983). The Death Instinct. Psychoanal. Rev., 70:559-570.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.


Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

OpenAthens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1983). Psychoanalytic Review, 70(4):559-570

The Death Instinct

Uri Lowental

The “death instinct” has always been a much disputed concept, due to the following chain of tenets: (1) Life and death instincts seem irreconcilable. (2) Its contiguity to aggression obscures the instinct's isolated operation. (3) The considerable gap between the instinct's hypothetical instigations and clinical phenomena. (4) Drive theory alone does not lead to a sound conceptualization of the death instinct, neither does the object-relations theory nor that of psychopathology. It is proposed to disengage one link in the chain of dispute and sever the attachment to aggression, so that death-oriented behavior will become like any other behavior: a combination of drives with their derivatives and with moderating or reactive defenses; it may then be compared to a symptom or character trait, its causal factors forming an “aetiological continuum.”

The proposed conjecture is that the death instinct (sensu strictu) accounts only for one fraction of the death motivation (like selfpunishment, for example, which accounts for another fragment). Based upon clinical material this assumption will also be tested in light of Freud's (1895) “aetiologic equation,” his model of syndrome- and character-formation, i.e. the complementary series of (a) precondition, (b) specific cause, (c) concurrent cause, and (d) precipitating cause. A preliminary resume of the present study, wherein the equation is applied to the death motivation, is this: (a) precondition—death instinct, primary, congenital; (b) specific cause—the realization of death through object loss, mother's disappearance; (c) concurrent


* An abridged version of this paper was read before the Israel Psychoanalytic Society, Jerusalem, February 21, 1979.

- 559 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.