Login
Mollinger, S. (1983). On Hawthorne, Emerson and Narcissism. Psychoanal. Rev., 70:571-594.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

Athens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1983). Psychoanalytic Review, 70:571-594

On Hawthorne, Emerson and Narcissism

Shernaz Mollinger Author Information

Our contemporary levels of self-concern make it difficult to believe that the self has not always taken up quite so much room as it now does. The Modernist challenge to the “bourgeois myth” of society resulted in a self extended to fill the void left by the collapsed validity of everything else, and this extended self is reflected again and again in the self-referential literature of this century. Much has been written recently about the “new narcissism” and also about the self-involvement (text-involvement) of many 20th century literary texts. However, in America at least the phenomenon is not all that new. The abstracting, idealizing, cavalier morality, obsession with immediacy and superficial affects that are typical narcissistic defenses may be found in the culture of our time, as Christopher Lasch (1979) has argued, but they are also quite evident in the literature and thought of early 19th century New England. The reasons for this have to do with a pervasive and long-term undermining of authority, an undercutting that characterizes the modernist period but that in America had already surfaced by the 18th century and that then achieved, along with the growth of self that was its concomitant, a remarkably full expression in the language and thought of some American Renaissance writers.

The aim of this essay is to look at the question of narcissism in the work of Hawthorne and Emerson in relation to the historical situation in which they wrote. Hawthorne and Emerson, in both their lives and their writing, represent the opposing possibilities available to the American self in the early 19th century. The opposition can be seen as the culmination of a century-long movement away from god and to self, as the result of a drastic shift from the god-centered universe of early New England to a world where Emerson's radical individualism

- 571 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2014, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing. Help | About | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Problem

WARNING! This text is printed for the personal use of the subscriber to PEP Web and is copyright to the Journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to copy, distribute or circulate it in any form whatsoever.