Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: For example:
Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Lepkowsky, C. Berkowitz, S. (1983). Play It Again, Sigmund. Psychoanal. Rev., 70(4):621-624.
(1983). Psychoanalytic Review, 70(4):621-624
Play It Again, Sigmund
Review by: Charles Lepkowsky
Casablanca1 has long been recognized as a film classic. It is universally popular, and is considered by many to be the most technically correct motion picture ever made. Certainly, the plot is clever and the dialogue witty; the characterdevelopment progresses smoothly and consistently; and each scene is artfully directed and leads into the next, so that the film's tension builds gradually and reaches its peak during the final scene. Nothing is wasted, no gesture is made nor word spoken that fails to enrich a character's personality or thicken the plot.
Yet Casablanca's appeal extends beyond its technical virtues in a way that cannot adequately be explained by the complex story line or the quality of the production. Indeed, much of the black and white film's technique and characterization is dated and stereotypical, and the story itself fails to meet the standards for a traditional Hollywood happy ending: the hero not only doesn't get the girl, but ends up as a fugitive in the bargain. Nonetheless, the audience is left feeling victorious, warm, and satisfied at the film's conclusion.
This reaction cannot be attributed simply to the patriotic fervor generated at the story's end, which is clearly dated and in some ways incomprehensible to a new generation of young viewers. Youthful audiences not only enjoy Casablanca, but more importantly, are affected by it in much the same way as was the audience that first saw it in 1943. It is in this emotionally arousing way that Casablanca is “timeless.”
What is proposed here is that the inherent, emotionally satisfying nature of Casablanca derives in analytic terms from its success in dramatically recapitulating the resolution of the oedipal complex. The primarycharacter Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bogart) is the oedipal figure in the drama, and it is with him that the audience identifies. When we first meet Rick he is cynical, self-serving, politically unaffiliated, and tough. Although he is capable of forming object relations, these are negatively valenced, characterized by pushing-away rather than moving-towards, and leading to disconnectedness. One of Rick's first actions in the film is to eject from his club a woman whom he has clearly misused. We learn from his conversation and the comments of others that she is but one of many such “discarded” females. Rick denies his
- 621 -
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]