Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager? Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format. You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Karpowitz, S.A. (1987). “The Love-Child” Freud's Essay on the Moses of Michelangelo. Psychoanal. Rev., 74(3):333-345.
  

(1987). Psychoanalytic Review, 74(3):333-345

“The Love-Child” Freud's Essay on the Moses of Michelangelo

Stephen A. Karpowitz, Ph.D.

“The Moses of Michelangelo” remains especially interesting to those who wish to understand the personality of Sigmund Freud. Parts of it are among his most lyrical and personal writings; yet, throughout, it is his least analytic work. Ostensibly he took up two subjects at once: Why did Michelangelo's statue of Moses affect him so deeply? And what is the true meaning of the figure's posture and expression? To answer one, Freud (1914) writes, is to answer the other, for the artist aims “to awaken in us the same emotional attitude, the same mental constellation as that which in him produced the impetus to create” (p. 212). My focus in this paper is on the personal factors that allowed Freud to overvalue the idea of Michelangelo's work. What, in truth, did it mean to him?

Freud agrees with most writers on the subject that Michelangelo portrayed Moses at a particular time in his life, when he descended from Mount Sinai with the Tables of the Law and saw his people worshipping the Golden Calf. Critics disagree over exactly which moment in time Michelangelo had chosen to portray. Most thought his Moses was about to rise up and smash the Tables, as in Exodus. Freud concluded that Michelangelo's Moses also has that impulse, but restrains himself, and chooses instead to sit arrested in his anger forever. As one critic with whom Freud agreed put it, the statue of Moses represents a character-type, not a historical figure. Freud's interpretation went further. The Moses of Michelangelo is preferable to the Biblical Moses, and superior to him. This

giant frame with its tremendous physical power becomes only a concrete expression of the highest mental achievement that is possible in a man—that of struggling successfully against an inward passion for the sake of a cause to which he has devoted himself. (p.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.