Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

McMahon, D.F. (1989). The Psychological Significance of Science Fiction. Psychoanal. Rev., 76(2):281-295.
  

(1989). Psychoanalytic Review, 76(2):281-295

The Psychological Significance of Science Fiction

David F. McMahon, M.D.

Introduction

The words “A long time ago in a galaxy far away …” introduce us to Star Wars, one of the most successful motion pictures ever made. The film industry was astonished at the success of this “space fantasy,” as its creator, George Lucas, calls it. What in our late-twentieth-century Western culture explains the psychological magnetism of such a film? What explains the plethora of college courses examining science fiction literature as a serious form of artistic expression?

In the final section of this article I shall address the question of the psychological function of science fiction in our culture. As a foundation for that discussion, I shall first define science fiction1 and highlight its historical terrain, and then review specific psychological themes found in science fiction literature and cinema.

Author Sprague de Camp defined science fiction as “fiction based upon scientific or pseudo-scientific assumptions (space travel, robots, telepathy, earthly immortality, etc.) or laid in any patently unreal although not supernatural setting (the future, or another world, and so forth) …” (cited in Bernabeu, 1957). DeCamp suggests that stories of Utopias and unusual worlds are included in the field of science fiction. The complicated nature of this description underscores the broad range of subjects or settings that forms the genre.

Another aspect of the field is identified by John Harrington in his essay, “Science Fiction and the Future”:

Paradoxically, SF is one of the least scientific of fictions because it owes hardly anything to the facts of experience.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.