Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rothstein, A. (2006). Reflections on the Concept “Analyzability”;. Psychoanal. Rev., 93(5):827-833.

(2006). Psychoanalytic Review, 93(5):827-833

Reflections on the Concept “Analyzability”;

Arnold Rothstein, M.D.

This paper attempts to clarify the notion of analyzability and presents the evolution of my thinking on this issue.

One basic issue regarding analyzability is whether it is still a viable concept. In my view, it is not. It is an outmoded concept, a vestige of the evaluative model. A frequently posed question is whether analyzability is contingent on certain capacities in the patient, such as the capacity to symbolize. I suggest that all human beings have the capacity to symbolize; however, that capacity may not immediately be obvious or manifest. More important, the question implicitly derives from the “evaluative” model for doing a consultation and beginning an analysis.

As a candidate I was taught how to begin a treatment from the perspective of the evaluative model. In spite of the inspiring contributions of Stone (1954), Loewald (1960), and Kohut (1968) in the 1960s, the evaluative model remained unquestioned at that time. In fact, it persists as the characteristic model of pedagogy in most institutes to this day. Analytic training in general, and training in analyzability in particular, may engender the search for the mythical “good analytic case.”

The evaluative model proposes that the analyst, as authority, greet a prospective patient with an evaluative attitude. The analyst is trained to ask the question “Is this patient analyzable?” In an effort to answer that question, the analyst assesses the patient's personality and makes a diagnosis. If the patient is considered “neurotic,” or in Glover's (1955) terms “transference accessible” (pp. 185-187), analysis is the recommended treatment.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.