While performing a search, you can sort the articles by Author in the Search section. This will rearrange the results of your search alphabetically according to the author’s surname. This feature is useful to quickly locate the work of a specific author.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Kerr, J. (2010). Book Review Essay: So Long to Once upon a Time: Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis. By George Makari. New York: HarperCollins, 2008, 613 pp.. Psychoanal. Rev., 97(3):495-518.
(2010). Psychoanalytic Review, 97(3):495-518
Books: History of Psychoanalysis
Book Review Essay: So Long to Once upon a Time: Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis. By George Makari. New York: HarperCollins, 2008, 613 pp.
Review by: John Kerr
Once upon a time, every analyst knew the story of how psychoanalysis started. The outline went something like this: Once upon a time, a lonely genius, fighting against the prejudices of his era, and working on his own, made breakthrough discoveries in the understanding of the unconscious, including a novel appreciation for human sexuality and especially infantile sexuality, discovering as well the meaning of dreams and how they could be decoded. Forging these new truths in the heat of the therapeutic encounter, and via a heroic self-analysis, this solitary genius fashioned the only truly scientific and efficacious treatment method for neurosis.
Well, Freud was a genius, and he did invent psychoanalysis, but the rest of the account is mythical. Human sexuality was on everyone's mind at the turn of the nineteenth century—as a scientific topic, I mean— sexuality in childhood had already been discovered; clinicians like Charcot, Janet, and Richard von Krafft-Ebing were already investigating the meaning of at least some dreams in some patients (Sand, 1992); the unconscious as a topic had pretty much been done to death; and on it goes. This is a matter of history.
It was long an unwelcome history in analytic venues. The careful reader will have noted that “once upon a time” appears not once but twice in the first paragraph. The one pertaining to Freud is ordinary fairytale usage; the other one, oddly and disconcertingly, refers to real historical time. It was not so long ago, a couple of decades tops, that analysts were still holding on to a mythic view of Freud; they resisted, sometimes with real vehemence and anguished protests of “Freud bashing,” the historical scholarship that was meant to set the record straight.
Why that was the case deserves sympathetic scrutiny (see Kerr, 1992), and how and why it resolved, or dissolved, more recently is another topic worth investigating.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]