Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To access to IJP Open with a PEP-Web subscription…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Having a PEP-Web subscription grants you access to IJP Open. This new feature allows you to access and review some articles of the International Journal of Psychoanalysis before their publication. The free subscription to IJP Open is required, and you can access it by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bowlby, J. (1961). Note on Dr. Max Schur's Comments on Grief and Mourning in Infancy and Early Childhood. Psychoanal. St. Child, 16:206-208.
    

(1961). Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 16:206-208

Note on Dr. Max Schur's Comments on Grief and Mourning in Infancy and Early Childhood

John Bowlby, M.D.

In the last volume of this Annual, following my paper entitled "Grief and Mourning in Infancy and Early Childhood" (1960a), comments on it by Anna Freud, Max Schur, and René A. Spitz appeared. Many of the issues they raise I shall discuss in subsequent papers and in the book I have in preparation. Since, however, Schur has attributed to me a number of views which are other than those I hold, I believe it may avoid misunderstanding if I correct them briefly.

On pages 64 and 65 Schur has attributed to me the following views on instinct theory:

Bowlby's concept is therefore mainly based on that part of the instinct theory of ethology which assumes the fully innate, unlearned character of most complex behavior patterns [Schur's italics]…

Under the impact of this debate most ethologists, e.g., Thorpe, Tinbergen, and others, have abandoned the rigid insistence on the entirely innate origin of instinctive behavior, on the specificity of the drive element and of action-specific energy, and on the "hydrodynamic model"—all of which play such a great role in Bowlby's formulations [Schur's italics].

I am familiar with the work Schur refers to and, I believe, have not advanced the sort of theory he attributes to me; several times, indeed, I have expressed views of an opposite kind.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.