Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Esman, A.H. (1983). The "Stimulus Barrier"—A Review and Reconsideration. Psychoanal. St. Child, 38:193-207.

(1983). Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 38:193-207

The "Stimulus Barrier"—A Review and Reconsideration

Arron H. Esman, M.D.

FREUD'S CONCEPT OF THE "PROTECTIVE SHIELD AGAINST stimuli" (Reizschutz) has long been the object of considerable interest on the part of developmental psychologists and psychoanalysts. It seems germane to the concerns both of those who wish to study the effect of traumatic events on personality development and neurosogenesis and of those whose focus is on normative infant development and early interaction patterns. There have been a number of systematic reviews in the past (Benjamin, 1965); (Martin, 1968); (Gediman, 1971), but, apart from passing consideration by Shapiro and Stern (1980), none that has considered the concept in the light of those recent studies of infant behavior which have demonstrated a high level of sensory receptiveness in the newborn. In this essay I shall therefore attempt just such a review, seeking to place the stimulus barrier concept in a modern framework and to assess its relevance to current views of early development.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

As noted, a number of investigators have reviewed the literature on the subject of the protective shield; I shall therefore cite here only the most salient references in sketching the historical progression of the concept as it has evolved since Freud introduced it in Beyond the Pleasure Principle(1920).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.