Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Trop, J.L. (1995). Chapter 4 Reply to Ornstein. Progress in Self Psychology, 11:79-85.

(1995). Progress in Self Psychology, 11:79-85

Chapter 4 Reply to Ornstein Related Papers

Jeffrey L. Trop, M.D.

Paul Ornstein's discussion of my article, Self Psychology and Inter-subjectivity Theory: A Clinical Comparison (1994 also in this volume), highlights the differing perspectives of and similarities between self psychology and intersubjectivity theory. It will not be possible for me to consider all of Ornstein's criticisms, so I intend to address certain key issues.

As someone who has profound respect for the contributions of self psychology, I welcome the opportunity to continue this dialogue. Stephen Mitchell (1992) has commented on the importance of comparing the nuances of modern theories of psychoanalysis in his discussion of a paper by Trop and Stolorow (1992). He states:

In my view, the battle against orthodoxy has been largely won; the real vitality and creativity in this field have shifted to efforts, like the present one, to develop postclassical, broadly relational approaches to mind, development, and the analytic situation. Because the battle has been won, it is now less interesting to recount the deficiencies of the classical model than to explore the subtle but quite important differences among postclassical perspectives [p. 443].


[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.