Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of Freud SE or GW…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you hover your mouse over a paragraph of the Standard Edition (SE) long enough, the corresponding text from Gesammelte Werke slides from the bottom of the PEP-Web window, and vice versa.

If the slide up window bothers you, you can turn it off by checking the box “Turn off Translations” in the slide-up. But if you’ve turned it off, how do you turn it back on? The option to turn off the translations only is effective for the current session (it uses a stored cookie in your browser). So the easiest way to turn it back on again is to close your browser (all open windows), and reopen it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Teicholz, J.G. (2001). Chapter 2 The Many Meanings of Intersubjectivity and Their Implications for Analyst Self-Expression and Self-Disclosure. Progress in Self Psychology, 17:9-42.

(2001). Progress in Self Psychology, 17:9-42

I Theory

Chapter 2 The Many Meanings of Intersubjectivity and Their Implications for Analyst Self-Expression and Self-Disclosure

Judith Guss Teicholz, ED.D.

Probably not since Freud and Ferenczi parted ways because of their disagreement over Ferenczi's experiments with mutual analysis, have questions surrounding psychoanalytic intersubjectivity been as passionately debated as they are today. The controversy concerning whether psychoanalysis is better understood and practiced as a one- or a two-person process has been kept alive in various ways through the writings of Reich, Sullivan, Balint, Searles, Racker, Fairbairn, Guntrip, Winnicott, and others. But as interesting and important as these earlier contributions have been, the contemporary debate is so richly varied in its elements that I shall have to forego tracing its historical precedents in order simply to outline what today's authors mean by intersubjectivity and to explore how they see it as shaping either development or the analytic situation.

Current tensions center on divergent clinical recommendations devolving from multiple theories of intersubjectivity, with disagreements often centering on the quality and extent of the analyst's self-expression and self-disclosure.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.