Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: Understanding Rank

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When you do a search, you can sort the results bibliographically alphabetical or by “rank”. What is Rank?

Rank refers to the search engine’s “best guess” as to the relevance of the result to the search you specified. The exact method of ranking used varies a bit depending on the search. In its most basic level, when you specify a single search term, rank looks at the density of the matches for the word in the document, and how close to the beginning of the document they appear as a measure of importance to the paper’s topic. The documents with the most matches and where the term is deemed to have the most importance, have the highest “relevance” and are ranked first (presented first).

When you specify more than one term to appear anywhere in the article, the method is similar, but the search engine looks at how many of those terms appear, and how close together they appear, how close to the beginning of the document, and can even take into account the relative rarity of the search terms and their density in the retrieved file, where infrequent terms count more heavily than common terms.

To see a simple example of this, search for the words (not the phrase, so no quotes):

unconscious communications

Look at the density of matches in each document on the first page of the hits. Then go to the last page of matched documents, and observe the density of matches within the documents.

A more complex search illustrates this nicely with a single page and only 15 matches:

counter*tr* w/25 “liv* out” w/25 enact*

There are a lot of word forms and variants of the words (due to the * wildcards) above that can match, but the proximity (w/25) clause limits the potential for matching. What’s interesting here though is how easily you can see the match density decrease as you view down the short list.

The end result of selecting order by rank is that the search engine’s best “guess” as to which articles are more relevant appear higher on the list than less relevant articles.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Godfrind, J. (1999). Thierry Bokanowski, Sandor Ferenczi, dans Psychanalystes d'aujourd'hui, Paris, PUF, 1998.. Rev. Belg Psychanal., 34:91-92.

(1999). Revue Belge de Psychanalyse, 34:91-92


Thierry Bokanowski, Sandor Ferenczi, dans Psychanalystes d'aujourd'hui, Paris, PUF, 1998.

Jacqueline Godfrind

La collection des PUF “psychanalystes d'aujourd'hui”, dirigée par Paul Denis, a pour objectif de faire connaître la pensée de “psychanalystes d'aujourd'hui”, comme son intitulé l'indique. Le petit ouvrage consacré à Sandor Ferenczi, rédigé par Thierry Bokanowski, est en tous points remarquable. Ferenczi, on le sait, connaît une vogue actuelle qu'explique son esprit novateur : ses recherches dans le champ des “problématiques limites”, ses intuitions cliniques qui rejoignent les interrogations “techniques” d'aujourd'hui, ses avancées métaspychologiques qui préparent les théorisations de bien des auteurs contemporains font de lui un pionnier. Précurseur de la pensée psychanalytique actuelle, la place de Sandor Ferenczi dans la collection paraît parfaitement indiquée.

Th. Bokanowski s'emploie pertinemment à rendre les mouvements de pensée de S. Ferenczi, oscillatoires parfois, mais toujours inventifs. Il a le mérite de brosser non seulement une image du personnage original que fut Ferenczi, notamment dans ses relations avec Freud, mais un résumé fidèle des élaborations de cet auteur dont on sait l'intérêt essentiel pour la clinique. La synthèse que réalise Th. Bokanowski de l'oeuvre de Ferenczi n'exclut nullement une lecture personnelle alimentée à son propre intérêt pour la théorie de la technique (cf.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.