|Freud, S. (1910). The Antithetical Meaning of Primal Words. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmu..
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
Freud, S. (1910). [SEK153a1]The Antithetical Meaning of Primal Words. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XI (1910): Five Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, Leonardo da Vinci and Other Works, 153-162
[SEK153a1]The Antithetical Meaning of Primal Words
This Page Left Intentionally Blank
- 153 -
[SEK153a2]Editor's Note to "The Antithetical Meaning of Primal Words"
[SEK153a4]1910 Über Den Gegensinn Der Urworte Jb. psychoan. psychopath. Forsch., 2 (1), 179-184.
[SEK153a5]1913 Über Den Gegensinn Der Urworte S.K.S.N., 3, 280-287. (2nd ed. 1921.)
[SEK153a6]1924 Über Den Gegensinn Der Urworte G.S., 10, 221-228.
[SEK153a7]1943 Über Den Gegensinn Der Urworte G.W., 8, 214-221.
[SEK153a9]‘“The Antithetical Sense of Primal Words”’ 1925 C.P., 4, 184-191. (Tr. M. N. Scarl.)
[SEK153a10]The present translation with a modified title, ‘The Antithetical Meaning of Primal Words’, is a new one by Alan Tyson.
[SEK153a11]We are told by Ernest Jones (1955, 347) that Freud came across Abel's pamphlet in the autumn of 1909. He was particularly pleased by the discovery, as is shown by the many references he made to it in his writings. In 1911, for instance, he added a footnote on it to The Interpretation of Dreams (1900a), Standard Ed., 4, 318, and he summarized it at some length in two passages in his Introductory Lectures (1916-17), Lectures XI and XV. The reader should bear in mind the fact that Abel's pamphlet was published in 1884 and it would not be surprising if some of his findings were not supported by later philologists. This is especially true of his Egyptological comments, which were made before Erman
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]