Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one).  Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper.  Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Corbett, K. Goldner, V. (2002). “Stephen Moved Very, Very Fast”: Margaret Black, 2001. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 3(1):1-2.

(2002). Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 3(1):1-2

“Stephen Moved Very, Very Fast”: Margaret Black, 2001

Ken Corbett, Ph.D. and Virginia Goldner, Ph.D.

With deep sadness and grateful admiration, we devote this issue to the memory and legacy of our colleague, Stephen A. Mitchell. The shock of his death, more than a year past, has begun to yield to reflection and memory, and Steve has left us much to remember.

We have chosen to remember Steve by reprinting two of his earliest papers, one his very first, written in 1978, and the other written three years later. (The papers, reproduced here thanks to the generous permissions granted by the Guilford Press and the International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, are in their original form except for minor editorial and stylistic changes.) Together these papers critically engage postwar American psychoanalytic theory and treatment of homosexuality. These ambitious, prescient, and morally rigorous papers are not well known. Even scholars and clinicians who are reasonably familiar with the psychoanalytic literature on homosexuality may have missed them (see Roughton, this issue). We reprint them here to honor them as crucial instances of clarity, critique, and complexity in what Steve later referred to as a dark episode in American psychoanalysis (Mitchell, 1997, p. 255).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.