Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from pepeasy.pep-web.org. You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:

On IOS:

  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Lotz, M. (1989). Oedipuskomplekset (The Oedipus Complex): Ole Andkjær Olsen. Copenhagen: H. Reitzel, 1988. 520 pp.. Scand. Psychoanal. Rev., 12(1):89-90.

(1989). Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 12(1):89-90

Oedipuskomplekset (The Oedipus Complex): Ole Andkjær Olsen. Copenhagen: H. Reitzel, 1988. 520 pp.

Review by:
Martin Lotz

Olsen is an M. A. in literary history. He has previously (with S. Køppe) written a book on Freud's psychoanalysis, now appearing in an English translation (IUP).

The present work is the first Danish doctoral dissertation with its main emphasis on a psychoanalytical theme. It aims at describing the oedipus complex not as a strict psychoanalytical idea, but rather as a theoretical structure with operational value for several scientific areas: ethnology, sociology, semiology and psychoanalysis.

In the first 300 pages, Olsen reviews the relevant literature and then suggests that the traditional triangle: child, mother and father be replaced by a more abstract triad: the subject, the direct object and the symbolic object. Instead of the differences between sexes and generations, he stresses the active/passive polarity. The principle thus structured, he says, will be the basis for the final analysis instead of the private intrapsychical conflicts and object relations stemming from the interpersonal constellations in the family.

The last 150 pages of the book are not very easy to evaluate. Here, Olsen is working on a very high metapsychological theoretical level. His point of departure distances him from clinically employed psychoanalysts, where the private psychological sphere is at the center of understanding and interpretation. One might say that psychoanalysts would not be interested in the elaboration of such abstract ideas. On the other hand, Olsen has a right to claim that a theoretical concept like the oedipus complex might be generalized, not into any superimposed, unchangeable axiomatic idea, but to an agreed upon pragmatic but still central theoretical structure, useful for studies encompassing more than one area of science.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.