Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Szecsödy, I. (1994). Supervision–a complex tool for psychoanalytic training. Scand. Psychoanal. Rev., 17(2):119-129.

(1994). Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 17(2):119-129

Supervision–a complex tool for psychoanalytic training

Imre Szecsödy, M.D.

Davis M. Sachs opened his introductory paper at the Sixth IPA Conference of Training Analysts, 1993, in Amsterdam, with the following words: “Psychoanalytic education rests on a three-legged, educational stool; the training analysis, didactic courses and supervision. Such stools have a tendency toward instability whenever undue weight is placed upon one leg”. This system has been an official requirement in the training of candidates since 1924; still the topic of supervision has, before 1993, never been considered at a Conference of Training Analysis. “Reading the anonymous vignettes which we have received from the participants of the Conference, the Organizing Committee became convinced that the difficulty of the task (of supervision) has been greatly underestimated by the profession. It is remarkable that neither training in doing supervision nor study of the existing literature is required of new training analysts. Apparently, the traditional assumption has been that the training analysts simply have the ability supervise”. From a paper prepared by two candidates representing IPSO, Dr. Sachs paraphrased in the following way: “They are concerned that supervisors do not appreciate the complexity of the social structure in which they (the candidates) are living. They want the supervisor to appreciate the relationship they have to the Institute; the economic pressures under which they function; (as well as that) their concerns are not (only) ‘neurotic’ but (also) realistic problems which need to be respected….

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.