Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fichtner, G. (1997). Professional secrecy and the case history: A problem for psychoanalytic research. Scand. Psychoanal. Rev., 20(1):97-106.

(1997). Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 20(1):97-106

Professional secrecy and the case history: A problem for psychoanalytic research

Gerhard Fichtner

Does the physician's pledge of professional secrecy also apply to the historian working with historical sources which describe actual patients, that is to say, case histories of patients recorded by their physicians, medical reports, etc.? Or is it absurd to make such a demand on the historian, since, in his professional capacity, he has never had to submit to the physician's pledge of professional secrecy? And what about the researcher writing on the history of psychoanalysis? Is he also bound by this medical pledge of secrecy?

I raised these questions in my criticism of the Freud-Ferenczi correspondence (Fichtner, 1994). This is a professional problem which is not merely of a theoretical nature. In my opinion, this question will have considerable consequences for therapeutic practice. However, it may also have a general impact on the fate of medical records. It would be useful to continue discussing this question until we come to a broadly-held agreement. In this paper, I shall elucidate these postulates with new material which came to my attention while doing research in 1995 at the Freud-museum in London.

Surprisingly enough, the medical pledge of secrecy was very early universally accepted in the domain of medical ethics. It was already declared unequivocally in the Hippocratic oath:

“Whatever I may see or hear in the course of the treatment or even outside the treatment about the lives of people which must on no account be disseminated, I will keep to myself in the conviction that it is despicable to speak of such matters”. (Quotation, Edelstein, 1969, p. 8. transl. G.F.).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.