Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To limit search results by article type…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Looking for an Abstract? Article? Review? Commentary? You can choose the type of document to be displayed in your search results by using the Type feature of the Search Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Zepf, S. (2013). A note on the application of the term “disavowal” in psychoanalysis. Scand. Psychoanal. Rev., 36(1):35-42.

(2013). Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 36(1):35-42

A note on the application of the term “disavowal” in psychoanalysis

Siegfried Zepf

The author questions whether disavowal is to be understood as a defence mechanism in its own right. After discussing the different understandings of disavowal as a defence mechanism, as the outcome of defence mechanisms and as a synonym for defence in general, he recapitulates Freud's use of disavowal and confronts it with Freud's concept of defence mechanisms. He concludes that in Freud's conceptual framework, disavowal does not qualify as such a mechanism. To avoid the confusion produced by using disavowal with reference to a process, the outcome of a process, the individual in the general and the general in the individual, he recommends using the concept in Freud's conceptualisation only in agreement with Brenner, and Moore and Fine, to denote the properties of defence mechanisms and substitutive formations.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.