Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To access to IJP Open with a PEP-Web subscription…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Having a PEP-Web subscription grants you access to IJP Open. This new feature allows you to access and review some articles of the International Journal of Psychoanalysis before their publication. The free subscription to IJP Open is required, and you can access it by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Freud, S. (1916). Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, February 4, 1916. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi Volume 2, 1914-1919, 110-111.

Freud, S. (1916). Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, February 4, 1916. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi Volume 2, 1914-1919 , 110-111

Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, February 4, 1916 Book Information Previous Up Next

Sigmund Freud

Vienna, February 4, 1916
IX., Berggasse 19

Dear friend,

Pursuing my demonic plan further, I will not go into your autoanalytic communications, but instead accede to your last wishes concerning the Zeitschrift. That doesn't mean that I do not receive your continuing news about the inner theater of war with interest.

You will have learned about the external difficulties with Heller and at the press from the report by Sachs, who is really participating eagerly. I will act as if nothing of the kind existed. Sachs has agreed to send you all the available material.

We now have an essay by Stärcke (Everyday Life), which can come out in two parts,1 from which, however, I ask you to expunge the less splendid examples; and a first-rate paper by Abraham about the oral-cannibalistic preliminary stage of libido organization for no. 2.2

A book by Kaplan, “Ψ A Problems,”3 has been published, which I ask to be laid claim to by Deuticke in the name of the editorial board. It is praiseworthy in that it defends the correct Ψα conception against the dissidents in all matters in dispute; otherwise, it is certainly not profound or well organized. But we have always treated Kaplan too badly and should make it up to him. I am in favor of your taking on this task again as the appointed critical agency. On the Ψα movement I will send you a clipping from the Berner Bund after the meeting of the Society on Wednesday, which has to do with the reprimanding of Schneider, the seminar director in Switzerland.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.