Tip: PEP-Web Archive subscribers can access past articles and books…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
If you are a PEP-Web Archive subscriber, you have access to all journal articles and books, except for articles published within the last three years, with a few exceptions.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Ferenczi, S. (1927). Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, January 9, 1927. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi Volume 3, 1920-1933, 293-297.
Ferenczi, S. (1927). Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, January 9, 1927. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi Volume 3, 1920-1933, 293-297
Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, January 9, 1927
Internationale Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse
Herausgegeben von Prof. Dr. Sigm. Freud
Redigiert von Dr. M. Eitingon Dr. S. Ferenczi und Dr. Sándor Radó
New York, January 9, 1927
I thank you for the Rundbriefe and continue my report. Of the psychologists in America, Dr. Watson, the behaviorist,2 is probably the most active. In the “New School for Social Research,” where I am also lecturing, he gave a series of lectures about his doctrine, which essentially consists of the application of Pavlov's experiments on conditioned reflexes on human “behavior” in general. In completely failing to realize the complicatedness of “behavior”3 (that is probably the best translation of the word behaviourism4), and without the slightest sense for the historical, in complete denial of the significance of heredity on top of that, he thinks he has theoretically solved the whole problem of the psychic with the aid of the simplest experiments which he performed on animals, newborns, and children. Indeed, he considers himself called upon, also in a prophylactic regard, to be able to replace all psychology, naturally also psychoanalysis. In reality, in his behavioristic experiments he unconsciously—or in mis-perceiving the sources of his knowledge—utilizes the knowledge that he gained from analytic sources. After ending his course of instruction, he organized a discussion in the school, to which he invited Adolf Meyer (Johns Hopkins University),5 William A. White (Washington),6 Dr. Edward Kempf (New York), Jelliffe, and Blumgart.7
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]