Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Freud, S. (1928). Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, January 4, 1928. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi Volume 3, 1920-1933, 331-333.
Freud, S. (1928). Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, January 4, 1928. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi Volume 3, 1920-1933, 331-333
Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, January 4, 1928
Vienna, January 4, 1928
IX., Berggasse 19
Yesterday's mail brought two rare pieces: a report from S. Paulo (Brazil) that a ψα group has been formed there, which will apply for acceptance to the International,1 and your letter, to whose New Year's wishes I cordially respond, as [I did] twenty years ago. We are both certainly conscious of the impotence of our thoughts and the value of our basic attitude. Your enclosed paper—here reinclosed—testifies to that superior maturity that you have acquired in the last few years and in which no one approaches you. The title2 is excellent and deserved to be applied to more. For my recommendations on technique which I gave back then were essentially negative. I considered the most important thing to emphasize what one should not do, to demonstrate the temptations that work against analysis. Almost everything that is positive that one should do I left to “tact,” which has been introduced by you. But what I achieved in so doing was that the obedient ones didn't take notice of the elasticity of these dissuasions and subjected themselves to them as if they were taboos. That had to be revised at some time, without, of course, revoking the obligations.
I still have to raise an objection to your paper, which obviously doesn't belong in any journal but our own, to the effect that it is not three times as long and doesn't divide into [parts] I, II, III. There is no doubt that you still have many similar things to say, which would be very beneficial to hear.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]