After you perform a search, you can sort the articles by Source. This will rearrange the results of your search, displaying articles according to their appearance in journals and books. This feature is useful for tracing psychoanalytic concepts in a specific psychoanalytic tradition.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Freud, S. (1929). Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, June 10, 1929. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi Volume 3, 1920-1933, 369.
Freud, S. (1929). Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, June 10, 1929. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi Volume 3, 1920-1933, 369
Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, June 10, 1929
Vienna, June 10, 19291 IX., Berggasse 19
Do I need to assure you that both of you will be welcome to all of us, whenever you come?
I am already quite impatient to end this work period. The prosthesis treatment that your countryman Károlyi is performing on me also makes me fidgety (people say: nervous). He is doubtless very bright and skillful, but up to now we are having little success, and I am not yet certain whether I won't have to make the great sacrifice of a trip to Berlin.
I replied to Ophuijsen myself by responding to his Rundbrief, and, in fact, in an unambiguous fashion.2 Now I can be curious about Jones's visit.
I greet you cordially.
Notes to "Letter from Sigmund Freud to Sándor Ferenczi, June 10, 1929"
Ernst Falzeder and Eva Brabant
1 This letter was found in the folder for 1919; since the “2” in the date “1929” is so small, it can also be read as a “1.” The content (mention of the Ferenczis' planned visit in Salzburg, as well as the treatment of the prosthesis by Károlyi) shows, however, that this letter represents Freud's (otherwise missing) reply to Ferenczi's letter of June 7, 1929 (letter 1164).
2“If you don't want to destroy the IPA, you had better be careful. The first one who would resign from the IPA in the event that you should give in to the Americans in the question of lay analysis would be I, the author of ‘The Question of Lay Analysis’” (Freud to Ophuijsen, May 26, 1929, in Peter Heller, ed., Anna Freud's Letters to Eva Rosenfeld [Madison, Conn.: 1983], p. 135).
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]