Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Viederman, M. (2000). A Psychoanalytic Stance. Changing Ideas In A Changing World: The Revolution in Psychoanalysis. Essays in Honour of Arnold Cooper, 57-64.

Viederman, M. (2000). A Psychoanalytic Stance. Changing Ideas In A Changing World: The Revolution in Psychoanalysis. Essays in Honour of Arnold Cooper, 57-64

A Psychoanalytic Stance Book Information Previous Up Next

Milton Viederman, M.D.

Psychoanalytic Training and Early Aftermath

The imagined Freud of theory as elaborated in his papers on technique is quite different from the Freud who revealed himself in his clinical work and as revealed by the experience of his analysands. I made first acquaintance with the imagined Freud at the Columbia Psychoanalytic Center where I trained. Its founder, Sandor Rado, had founded the Hungarian Psychoanalytic Society before becoming a major figure in the Berlin Institute. Upon arriving in New York he developed the first curriculum at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute. His repudiation of aspects of classical theory led to controversy and he decided to found a University Institute at Columbia with the idea of bringing psychoanalysis into the mainstream of academia. By the time I began my training his highly authoritarian, anti-classical stance was losing its influence in a faculty that was remarkably eclectic. Yet there was concern about orthodoxy among the candidates. Psychoanalysis was an ideal, an ideal to be achieved through an understanding of theory rooted in Freud's work and an ideal to be practised in analytic work. It had a purity that was not to be defiled. The analytic situation was seen as having an exquisite sensitivity. Inappropriate “nonanalytic behaviour” could have dire consequences and interfere with a true analysis, for indeed there was a true analysis. My response to this was to be extremely cautious analytically, to defend against my inclination toward spontaneity and to be constricted in my analytic role.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.