Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To limit search results by article type…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Looking for an Abstract? Article? Review? Commentary? You can choose the type of document to be displayed in your search results by using the Type feature of the Search Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Abraham, K. (1907). Letter from Karl Abraham to Sigmund Freud, August 9, 1907. The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham 1907-1925, 6-8.

Abraham, K. (1907). Letter from Karl Abraham to Sigmund Freud, August 9, 1907. The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham 1907-1925, 6-8

Letter from Karl Abraham to Sigmund Freud, August 9, 1907 Book Information Previous Up Next

Karl Abraham


9 August 1907

Dear Professor Freud,

Today, once again, I have to ask for your understanding for not having replied to your letter any sooner. As both my superiors, Bleuler and Jung,1 were away at the same time, I have had no opportunity for anything but hospital duties during the last fortnight. I was very glad indeed to hear that you identify with the views I expressed in the last letter. However, I would add some comments regarding the two main points of your last letter.

The communication of phantasies, delusional ideas, etc., happens without resistance in certain phases of dementia præcox. Right at this moment I am treating a lady who reels off her most intimate affairs, including her religious delusion of grandeur, as an outsider would speak of some commonly known incident. Many mental patients behave like this in a particular phase. At other times, however, it is impossible to elicit even a single word about these matters. On yet other occasions, one easily obtains information about the delusional constructions, but not the least about the “voices”. This alternating behaviour is not clear to me. I would be ready to admit that the revelation of the most intimate secrets is a sign of the onset of dementia, if the concept of dementia had been clarified; so far, however, this is not the case. I believe what in cases of chronic mental illness is called dementia is nothing but the patient shutting himself away from the world, the withdrawal of libido from persons and objects. In organic psychoses and in epilepsy, one also speaks of dementia. This is unfortunate, since we are dealing with two completely different things. The epileptic becomes demented in a completely different way: in his case the mental impoverishment is progressive. Yet he retains the capacity to react emotionally, which is lost in the patient suffering from dementia præcox. In spite of all the dementia, even in deepest imbecility, the epileptic shows definite object-love. He is full of exaggerated praise for the members of his family; his handshake with the doctor cannot be cordial enough; he cannot find words enough to express his emotions; he clings tenaciously to his possessions—in everything the complete opposite of dementia præcox.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.