|Thomä, H., Kächele, H. (1987). Psychoanalytic Practice: 1 - Principles. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg New York Paris London Tokyo.|
Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.
If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.
If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.
Thomä, H. and Kächele, H. (1987). Psychoanalytic Practice. , 1-403. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg New York Paris London Tokyo.
Psychoanalytic Practice: 1 - Principles
In Collaboration with:
Amdreas Bilger, Manfred Cierpka, Hans-Joachim Grünzig, Roderich Hohage, Lisbeth KlöΒ, Julian Christopher Kübler, Lisbeth Neudert, Rainer Schors, Hartmut Schrenk, Brigitte Thomä
Michael Wilson, D. Roseveare
Forward by R. S. Wallerstein
Table of contents...x
A basic issue for all those essaying to write comprehensive texts on the nature of , whether oriented primarily to the exposition of the theory or of the of , - within the American literature the books by Brenner and by Greenson come to mind as exemplars of the two categories - is that of the relationship of the theory to the and the practice. This issue is however not always brought into explicit focus in this literature and thereby its problematic nature as a fundamental and not yet satisfactorily resolved dilemma of our discipline is often glossed over, or even bypassed completely, as if we could comfortably assume that Freud had, uniquely in the world's intellectual , fully succeeded in creating a science and a discipline in which the theory (the understanding) and the therapy (i. e., the cure) were inherently together and truly the same, but two sides of the same coin.
It is the achievement of Helmut ThomS and Horst Kachele, the authors of this book presenting within two volumes - this first one on theory and a second imminent companion volume on clinical interac* tion and application - an overall statement on what is (or should be) all about, that they have more than others kept this central problematic of the relationship of theory to practice in the center of the reader's conceptual field and have organized their presentation of the phenomena of our field, of its concepts and its data, accordingly. The heart of the problematic to which I am referring is caught in one short paragraph in Chap. 7: “As for , one can see that while the theories are predominantly concerned with the determinants of genesis, the rules of are oriented toward achieving the necessary and sufficient conditions for change: psychoanalytic is not simply application of theory” (p. 218, emphasis added). From this distinction and inevitable tension, all else follows - though it is of course also an oversimplification and something of an injustice for me to focus the overall thrust of this so very comprehensive book in just this way, or to imply that the whole range of conceptual problems of our field is caught up in the effort at the delineation of the interplay - and the - between theoretical and clinical therapeutic .
- v -
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]