Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: PEP-Web Archive subscribers can access past articles and books…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you are a PEP-Web Archive subscriber, you have access to all journal articles and books, except for articles published within the last three years, with a few exceptions.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rothstein, A. (1985). Appendix: The Spontaneous Discussion. Models of the Mind: Their Relationships to Clinical Work, 137-148.

Rothstein, A. (1985). Appendix: The Spontaneous Discussion. Models of the Mind: Their Relationships to Clinical Work , 137-148

Appendix: The Spontaneous Discussion Book Information Previous Up Next

Arnold Rothstein, M.D.

This chapter is similar to a panel report in that it summarizes the spontaneous discussion that was a central aspect of the workshop. The discussion consisted of statements concerning psychoanalytic theory and its development and more clinically focused statements about the data presented.

All the panelists conceived of their theories as arising in relationship to, out of, and/or in response to Freud's revolutionary and pioneering accomplishments. They differed somewhat in how they conceived of the post-Freudian process of the development of psychoanalytic theory and in their views of the appropriate strategies for the current and future development of psychoanalysis.

The primarily facilitating participants, Drs. Cooper, Roth-stein, and Sandler, as well as the panel chairmen all espoused some version of an evolutionary conception of the development of psychoanalytic theory.

Dr. Cooper reiterated his view that Freud was the only truly revolutionary psychoanalyst. In that regard Cooper conceives of subsequent psychoanalytic creators as proposing a model in the narrow sense or a “concrete puzzle solution” to deal with a particular problem. Cooper emphasized that each limited problem-solving hypothesis then expanded into a general theory of the mind hypothesizing a unifactorial “first causeconception of development, pathogenesis, and mode of therapeutic action.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.