Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To search for a specific phrase…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you write an article’s title and the article did not appear in the search results? Or do you want to find a specific phrase within the article? Go to the Search section and write the title or phrase surrounded by quotations marks in the “Search for Words or Phrases in Context” area.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Leverenz, D. (1975). Shared Fantasy In Puritan Sermons. Am. Imago, 32(3):264-287.

(1975). American Imago, 32(3):264-287

Shared Fantasy In Puritan Sermons

David Leverenz

“How insipid is fiction to a mind touched with immortal views!”

Mary Moody Emerson

Most studies of the Puritan sermon, especially as it was preached in America, have emphasized its intellectual rigor, its five-point or three-point formalism, its “plain style,” its judgmental and “Jeremiad” tendencies, and its fidelity to the Bible. These conscious Sunday intentions were clearly important, and many Puritans found sermons helpful for stiffening their qualities of mind as well as their habits of attention to God's word. Sermons not only served what Freud would call the “super-ego functions “of Puritan society, but they also encouraged mental toughness, a faith in “larger patterns,” and a variety of community bonds, no small need in a wilderness that made survival itself improbable.

But sermons, like any works of art, also encouraged their audience toward shared fantasy. Especially for the first generation of American Puritans, these fantasies were stimulated by the imagery given to words, such as “God,” “Christ,” “sin,” “self,” “grace,” even “the Word.”

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.