Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To view citations for the most cited journals…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Statistics of the number of citations for the Most Cited Journal Articles on PEP Web can be reviewed by clicking on the “See full statistics…” link located at the end of the Most Cited Journal Articles list in the PEP tab.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kelman, H. (1954). The Use of the Analytic Couch. Am. J. Psychoanal., 14(1):65-82.

(1954). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 14(1):65-82

The Use of the Analytic Couch

Harold Kelman, M.D.

The Analytic Couch not only has come to symbolize analysis, it has been considered to be analysis. This rigid and absolutistic attitude obtains in the public mind and in the practice of many analysts. For some it is a dictum: no couch, no analysis. Such a dogmatic position is at variance with newer psychoanalytic theory and practice, which regard the couch as another important tool to be used when it can be effective in helping move the analysis forward in a constructive direction.

The analytic couch has a history. Our attitudes are influenced by it. The couch was used prior to Freud and by him as an aid in hypnosis. He continued with it as he developed the method of free association and other fundamental aspects of psychoanalysis. His continued use of the couch was consistent with the passivity of his method and his notions of transference and counter-transference.

That Freud proceded in his investigations as he did is understandable. His method was in keeping with Nineteenth Century notions of science which had deeply influenced him. It required that the experimental situation have as many fixed coordinates as possible and as few variables. For Freud the couch became one of the fixed coordinates. I feel his scientific orientation determined his constant use of the couch much more than his personal feeling that he could not stand patients staring at him all day. He added that it was “the only method suited to my individuality,”1 and regarding some suggestions on technique, he brought them “forward as ‘recommendations’ without claiming any unconditional acceptance of them.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.