Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To keep track of most cited articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can always keep track of the Most Cited Journal Articles on PEP Web by checking the PEP Section found on the homepage.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rioch, D.M. (1960). Recent Contributions of Neuropsychiatric Research to the Theory and Practice of Psychotherapy. Am. J. Psychoanal., 20(2):115-129.

(1960). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 20(2):115-129

Recent Contributions of Neuropsychiatric Research to the Theory and Practice of Psychotherapy

David Mck. Rioch, M.D.

It is a pleasure to express my appreciation for the privilege and honor implied by this opportunity to give the Karen Horney Lecture of 1960, particularly as the material I wish to discuss has been obtained by the basic methods of clinical investigation of psychiatric problems in which Dr. Horney was so able a pioneer. Further, the clinical studies we will briefly review here independently confirm Dr. Horney's conclusions on the importance for mental health and mental illness of current events and social factors. They thus contribute to the concept of “the whole patient” as the concern of therapy.

Clinical research is a difficult and taxing field. The investigator necessarily explores unknown areas which affect the health, welfare and happiness of other human beings. He has a pre-determined, or at least a clearly anticipated goal: change from abnormality toward normality. He uses all available information, methods, and tools to promote this change, utilizing all the cues and all the factors which are available to him in the total situation. The criteria of validity are those of the direction of the course of the process with respect to the desired result. This is quite different from the application of the experimental or scientific method to a problem. In the latter case the objective is to differentiate a complex phenomenon into two or more simpler parts (concepts) by operations which can be communicated (or defined) in generally understood terms. The criteria are those of economy, consistency, and accuracy of operational definition. It is quite clear that the rigorous scientific method cannot be applied in exploration. It is necessary that the area of investigation be defined and that—especially in therapy—the course of the interaction be brought under sufficient control to permit measurements and comparison. It is thus only after exploratory clinical investigations have provided a stable situation that more or less clearly defined operations (measurements) can be applied for differentiating the factors in the situation and determining their relevance.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.