Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Schimel, J.L. (1974). Discussion. Am. J. Psychoanal., 34(3):237-240.
   

(1974). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34(3):237-240

Discussion

John L. Schimel, M.D.

Dr. Badaracco's presentation is at its most persuasive when she is describing the changing dilemmas of patients, defining the role of psychoanalyst as clinician, and delineating the openness and liveliness of the practitioners who can “attend to the movements, shifts, and complaints of society as well as those of individual patients.”

The patient must lead in the sense of designating the area of perceived problem and pain and in coming to the psychoanalyst in the first place. The psychoanalyst, in turn, must lead in the sense of being a guide for patients in exploring the deeper or unperceived recesses of intrapsychic, interpersonal, and cultural conflict, with an exposure of their “disregarding (of) themselves, in longing for what they are missing, but with unassailable riches and resources unknown and lying fallow within themselves.” I regard the foregoing as the observations of a psychoanalyst who is not only objective and scientific but who also has a poetic grasp of both the anguish and the promise of the human condition. I agree with Dr. Badaracco's criticism of psychoanalysis when it “does not recognize the new area(s) of vital interest … but keeps prowling about the old.” And I can say from experience that the confrontation of the “new” patient with the “old” psychoanalysis can be poignant and even destructive, particularly when the patient is an adolescent or young adult.

I prefer Dr. Badaracco's formulation of the psychoanalytic situation to Dr.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.