Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager? Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format. You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Rendon, M. (1984). Clinical Work in the Horney Tradition. Am. J. Psychoanal., 44(3):319-333.
(1984). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 44(3):319-333
Clinical Work in the Horney Tradition
Mario Rendon, M.D.
A long history bears witness to the merit of the clinical method; it is the heir of folk medicine, of magic, and of religion. Only in the last few centuries has it entered the field of science. After unprecedented growth during the last century, when it reached its zenith, the clinical method in medicine has seen a certain involution owing to causes that I will discuss below. At the same time, the humanities have rapidly advanced, dividing progressively into more and more specialized areas. Within this framework, psychoanalysis appears as the branch of the sciences of man in which the clinical method continues to be the cornerstone, the sine qua non of its theory and its practice, and the privileged area that condenses it all.
Nevertheless, if we look at psychoanalysis, which originated in medicine and was the product of a need to address psychopathological problems, we find a contradiction: after inspiring psychiatry, at least in the United States, during the postwar decades, psychoanalysis seems to have moved further and further away from medicine. Psychiatry, as part of medicine, is more and more oriented toward the systematic research of groups, and toward epidemiology, statistics, pharmacodynamics, psychometrics, and electroencephalography.
As these developments have taken place, psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic groups have multiplied; new theoretical, if not ideological, versions are swarming, myriads of short-term therapies, marathons, and self-help groups appear, while new clinics and institutes are established. This accelerated growth of the psychotherapeutic market, in turn, arises from diverse political, social, and ideological roots. As dichotomy is then established between the progressive blossoming of the psychotherapies, including psychoanalysis, and the increasing rejection of psychoanalysis in the mental therapeutics.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]