Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To zoom in or out on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).

Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.

Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Elkind, S.N. (1994). The Consultant's Role in Resolving Impasses in Therapeutic Relationships. Am. J. Psychoanal., 54(1):3-13.

(1994). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 54(1):3-13

The Consultant's Role in Resolving Impasses in Therapeutic Relationships Related Papers

Sue Nathanson Elkind, Ph.D.

For the past ten years, I have been investigating unresolvable impasses in therapy and ruptured terminations: times when therapeutic relationships founder in deadlocks; when patients are wounded and cannot recover; and when the therapeutic relationship ruptures, leaving the patient feeling harmed and beyond help, and the therapist1 feeling helpless, whether relieved or regretful.

I have found that experiences of serious impasses, wounding, and rupture are more common than we acknowledge. A survey I conducted in 1987 among 330 therapist members of the Psychotherapy Institute in Berkeley, California, revealed that 53 percent of the respondents had been patients in a therapy that had ended in a rupture. Of these, 72 percent were left feeling harmed by the experience. I would like to see resources provided for patients and therapists who have been grappling alone with these distressing and often devastating experiences.

I have also found that serious impasses and ruptures occur most often when both patients' and therapists' primary vulnerabilities and defenses intersect in unmanageable ways. Primary vulnerability is a concept I discuss at length in my book, Resolving Impasses in Therapeutic Relationships (Guilford Publications, 1992), but for our purposes I will simply rely on your intuitive sense of its meaning. I am referring to a core issue, for example, abandonment, trust, envy, that is often shaped early in development, influenced by the temperament, personality, and circumstances of infant and caretaker through cumulative interactions. We each have primary vulnerabilities—only their content, our defenses to manage them, and our awareness of them vary.

Since the late 1980s I have been receiving and responding to an increasing number of requests to serve as a consultant to patients and therapists in dyads who are grappling with unresolvable impasses, or who are trying to make sense of ruptures that have already occurred.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.