If you find an article or content on PEP-Web interesting, you can share it with others using the Social Media Button at the bottom of every page.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Goldberg, D.L. (1994). A Particular Perspective on Impasses in the Clinical Situation: Further Reflections on Psychoanalytic Listening Presenter: Evelyne Albrecht Schwaber, M.D.. Am. J. Psychoanal., 54(4):366-367.
(1994). American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 54(4):366-367
A Particular Perspective on Impasses in the Clinical Situation: Further Reflections on Psychoanalytic Listening Presenter: Evelyne Albrecht Schwaber, M.D.
Donna Lieberman Goldberg, Psy.D.
Evelyne Schwaber described an impasse historically as a manifest, puzzling event apparent to analyst and patient alike. In its more current context, she notes, an impasse may be disguised and can occur quietly, unrelentingly, perceived by either analyst or patient, but not necessarily recognized simultaneously by both. How we understand and listen to the nuances of a patient's communication, according to Schwaber, enables us to remove the impediments that block analytic work.
In looking for the seeds of development of an impasse, Schwaber directed our attention to what she calls “soft signs” in the patient's response—a hesitation or elusive quality, a shift in tone or demeanor, a fleeting, penetrating glance, or an inconsistency between content and affect. Analogously, she pondered the exploration of vital feeling states and pivotal conflictual characterological issues in the analyst, and wondered how they can remain outside clinical focus.
Four cases illustrating clinical impasses were offered, with Schwaber unabashedly citing her own unconscious contributions: In the case of Mr. K, a young man seeking therapy for intense loneliness and a lifelong learning disability, she found herself conducting the treatment according to her own psychic reality and middle-class values, rather than incorporating the patient's reality or inner experience. In hindsight, Schwaber recalled bypassing her patient's expression of doubt and the blandness of his “maybe,” thus ignoring a central aspect of his response.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]