Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Dorpat, T.L. (1978). Psychological Aspects of Accidents. Ann. Psychoanal., 6:273-283.

(1978). Annual of Psychoanalysis, 6:273-283

Psychological Aspects of Accidents

T. L. Dorpat, M.D.

The aim of this paper is to report the findings and conclusions of a study of three psychoanalytic patients who had multiple accidents. This is a microanalytic study in that it will focus on specific events, affects, fantasies, and defensive operations which occurred just prior to the accidents. Before presenting the case studies I will first briefly review some of the semantic and methodological problems in psychoanalytic research on accidents.

Accident or Action?

The accidents of these patients were not intentional acts; they were accidents, not actions. Recognizing the distinction between accidents and actions is essential for understanding the following discussion. Accidents are happenings; they are not, by definition, human actions. Unlike actions, accidents are not consciously or unconsciously intentional, and they are not intrinsically meaningful. Jumping off a cliff is an action; losing one's footing and falling off a cliff is an accident. According to Schafer (1976), “action is human behavior that has a point; it is meaningful human activity; it is intentional or goal-directed performances by people; it is doing things for reasons” (p. 139). Although they are not actions, accidents, such as the ones studied in this report, are sometimes, in part, the indirect consequences of human actions. For example, the accidents in this study came about because the subjects did not take self-preserving precautions in dangerous situations. Their failure to take such precautions was a manifestation of their need to deny danger.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.