Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To open articles without exiting the current webpage…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To open articles without exiting your current search or webpage, press Ctrl + Left Mouse Button while hovering over the desired link. It will open in a new Tab in your internet browser.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gedo, J.E. (1995). The Pragmatics of Empathy. Ann. Psychoanal., 23:1-12.

(1995). Annual of Psychoanalysis, 23:1-12

I Clinical and Theoretical Papers

The Pragmatics of Empathy

John E. Gedo, M.D.

For a generation at the very least, there has been no disagreement within psychoanalysis about the essential role of empathy in making possible the accomplishment of the clinical goals of its procedures (see Kohut, 1959; Stone, 1961, 1981; Schwaber, 1981; Gedo, 1981, chapter 6; Gehrie, 1993). We also have consensus about defining empathy as a mode of observation based on a trial identification with the person observed, predicated on the common human characteristics of the participants. It is not uncommon, however, to encounter statements in the literature equating empathy with the acceptance without demurral of the subjective viewpoint of the analysand (see Kohut, 1984p. 174; also Schwaber, 1983); self psychologists, in particular, tend to look upon any analytic intervention that causes the analysand pain or humiliation as “unempathic.” Hence it is by no means obvious how, in practice, analysts should conduct themselves “empathically.” Is it sufficient to devise interventions informed by the results of empathic observation? Should the analyst, in addition, affirm the legitimacy of the analysand's subjectivity or strive to avoid injuries to the latter's self-esteem? Is it desirable to make certain that the analysand feels the “healing power” so often attributed to empathy?

In my clinical experience, most analysands regard the ordinary routines of psychoanalysis as empathic to a degree unprecedented in their past: the nonjudgmental effort to discern their motivations is generally appreciated as true acceptance. Whenever this is the analysand's reaction to treatment, any doubts we may express about the rationality, wisdom, or accuracy of his or her subjectivity is easily accommodated as helpful and potentially illuminating.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.