Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To share an article on social media…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you find an article or content on PEP-Web interesting, you can share it with others using the Social Media Button at the bottom of every page.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Levin, F.M. (1995). Psychoanalysis and Knowledge: Part 3. Some Thoughts on a Line of losophy of Mind. Ann. Psychoanal., 23:131-151.

(1995). Annual of Psychoanalysis, 23:131-151

Psychoanalysis and Knowledge: Part 3. Some Thoughts on a Line of losophy of Mind

Fred M. Levin, M.D.

In Part 1, a companion paper, I criticize the modern trend of conceptualizing mind/brain activity in terms of internal “representations.” In its place I suggest nonrepresentational, interdisciplinary theories of learning such as those of Rapaport (1951) and Gedo (1991). Such learning theories reexamine how knowledge is acquired, an ancient epistemological question. In Part 2, a second companion paper, I examine, together with Ernest Kent, more details of such “expert systems,” introducing an interdisciplinary perspective on the concept of psychoanalytic transference. Specifically, I suggest that transference plays an important role in the reorganization and deepening of core knowledge systems.

In Part 3, the present essay, I explore some of the philosophical issues raised by Parts 1 and 2, concentrating on a line of development of philosophy of mind in which the major nodal points are the contributions of Aristotle, Kant, and Freud. Philosophy of mind impacts on several aspects of psychoanalytic concern.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.