Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Sayers, J. (2007). Beyond Abjection: Art, Religion, Psychoanalysis. Ann. Psychoanal., 35:165-177.

(2007). Annual of Psychoanalysis, 35:165-177

Beyond Abjection: Art, Religion, Psychoanalysis

Janet Sayers, Ph.D.

Freud famously contrasted art with neurosis and religion. Artists, he argued, use their skill to sublimate and realize their fantasies in their art. This could include fantasies of killing the father and marrying the mother, as in Sophocles' drama Oedipus Rex. By contrast, the neurotic represses such fantasies and may symbolically repeat and atone for them in the form of self-punishing symptoms. Similarly, Freud maintained, religious practices (e.g., Holy Communion) repeat and atone for a prehistoric event in which, he speculated, brothers banded together to kill the patriarchal leader of the primal horde so as to sexually possess his women, this in turn being atoned for by society's subsequently developed, patriarchally ordained taboo on incest.

In this essay I argue that psychoanalysis, like art and like religion, can be understood as sublimating rather than repressing fantasy, specifically the fantasy that Freud described as the oceanic illusion of oneness with otherness, Klein called the fantasy of projective identification, Lacan called imaginary oneness with one's mirrored reflection, and Bion called at-one-ment with O. In arguing this I draw particularly on Kristeva's development of these ideas in ways that go beyond her riposte, with which I will begin, to Freud's account of religion as defense against parricide by emphasizing instead its abjection of horror of return to incestuous oneness with our mothers in the womb.



[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.