Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see the German word that Freud used to refer to a concept…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to know the exact German word that Freud used to refer to a psychoanalytic concept? Move your mouse over a paragraph while reading The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud and a window will emerge displaying the text in its original German version.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rangell, L. (1954). Similarities and Differences Between Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychotherapy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:734-744.

(1954). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2:734-744

Similarities and Differences Between Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychotherapy

Leo Rangell, M.D.

This discussion is aimed at the exploration of a single question, that of describing the ground in common, and of delineating the specific differentiating points, between psychoanalysis on the one hand and dynamic psychotherapy on the other. It is the case that any effort to compare and to appraise the differences between these two disciplines or techniques leads inevitably into the realm of basic and fundamental concepts. To orient such an exploration with respect to the present stage of development of our science, it can be said that in this effort we are pausing, while already busy at work on some of the upper stories and even the interior decorating of our psychoanalytic edifice, as reflected for example by our recent close attention to the complexities of ego function, to re-examine the very foundation. This can be helpful, inasmuch as (a) cracks and splits in the latter can occur while we are busy upstairs—splits which, if possible, had best be repaired in order for the building to continue to stand, and (b) if the foundation can itself be refined or improved, this should always be welcome.

That this investigation is not focusing on an already settled problem is attested to by the experiences of the Committee on Evaluation of Psychoanalytic Therapy, set up within the American Psychoanalytic Association in 1947. In the years of its work since then, this Committee was never able to pass the initial and vexatious point of trying to arrive at some modicum of agreement as to exactly what constitutes psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and possibly transitional forms.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.