Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Stein, M.H. (1984). Rational Versus Anagogic Interpretation: Xenophon's Dream and Others. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 32:529-556.

(1984). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 32:529-556

Rational Versus Anagogic Interpretation: Xenophon's Dream and Others

Martin H. Stein, M.D.

SUMMARY

Freud's insistence that "a dream is a (disguised) fulfilment of a (suppressed or repressed) wish" has come under attack repeatedly. This principle, while never widely accepted, was nevertheless expressed, explicitly or otherwise, in the works of Homer, Herodotus, Plato, and other writers of the classical world. A detailed account of a dream of Xenophon's is employed to illustrate the capacity of a psychologically naïve Athenian writer to reject anagogic interpretation in favor of a more soundly based understanding of his own dreams. This is followed with a discussion of "dreams from above," which are most likely to raise this particular issue, one of considerable clinical and theoretical importance.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.