Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To restrict search results by language…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Search Tool allows you to restrict your search by Language. PEP Web contains articles written in English, French, Greek, German, Italian, Spanish, and Turkish.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bachrach, H.M. McNutt, E.R. (1992). Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy—Similarities and Differences: Indications, Contraindications, and Initiation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:223-231.

(1992). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 40:223-231

Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy—Similarities and Differences: Indications, Contraindications, and Initiation

Henry M. Bachrach, Ph.D. and Edith R. McNutt, M.D.

INTRODUCING THE PANEL, Bachrach observed that when this subject was first taken up in a series of panels in 1954, other clinical disciplines were embracing psychoanalysis, and the climate was ripe for emphasis on the differences between psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy. In 1954 M. M. Gill and L. Rangell saw the crux of psychoanalysis in the development and resolution of a transference neurosis by interpretation, while psychotherapy was the skillful manipulation of transferences toward therapeutic ends. While maintaining these differences, L. Stone called for a widened scope of indications for the application of the psychoanalytic method employing clinically indicated modifications. Anna Freud questioned this effort. Both Stone and A. Freud called attention to "grey" areas of modifications and variations. The clinical and conceptual consequences of such modifications have continued to be a subject of debate.

Bachrach made a distinction between the clinical elasticity of the psychoanalytic method and the scientific elasticity of the method. He noted that when the method is altered, the relation between free association and transference is altered, the resulting data are influenced, and one can no longer be certain whether such data can be used to confirm psychoanalytic hypotheses. He raised the following question: When does a modified method become a new method by which analytic hypotheses can no longer be tested, and to what extent does psychoanaytic psychotherapy have a method that is scientifically comparable to psychoanalysis?

Bachrach observed that the panelists had not responded to the topic of the panel with a list of indications.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.