Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web? For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Lidz, T. (1994). The Personal Myth in Psychoanalytic Theory: Edited by Peter Hartocollis and Ian B. Graham. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, 1991, xviii + 413 pp., $50.00.. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 42:940-945.

(1994). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 42:940-945

The Personal Myth in Psychoanalytic Theory: Edited by Peter Hartocollis and Ian B. Graham. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, 1991, xviii + 413 pp., $50.00.

Review by:
Theodore Lidz, M.D.

The volume contains 17 of the contributions by the outstanding analysts invited to present papers at the First Delphi International Psychoanalytic Symposium in 1984. The editors, who organized the symposium, selected the topic of the mythological aspects of metapsychological theory for the meeting held at the center of the ancient Greek world and of the myth that greatly influenced Freud's conceptualizations. They chose, I believe unfortunately, "personal myth," a concept introduced by Ernst Kris in 1956 as a suitable basis for reexamining the various streams or conceptualizations of psychoanalytic theory which they believed offered a means of resolving the conflicts between several dominant contemporary approaches to psychoanalytic theory and practice: predominantly, ego psychology, object-relations theory, and self psychology.

The term "personal myth" is catchy, but has limitations that challenge its appropriateness for the meeting and the book. Kris presented the concept as applicable to a few of his patients in whom an unconscious distortion or misapprehension of their origins or early experiences served as a defense against an awareness that would seriously upset their psychic equilibrium. This had given rise to a false life story and system of beliefs that were so rigidly defended that they made psychoanalysis impossible unless countered by specific measures Kris recommended. Although in his introductory chapter Graham presents his reasons for his belief that a focus on patients' personal myths can unify psychoanalytic theory, the reviewer could not follow his reasoning, perhaps because of the complexity of his discussion of many diverse analytic orientations. His Epilogue not only fails to find a unifying principle among the various presentations, but does not bear out his expectation that one will emerge from the symposium.

The contributions vary in value and are difficult to review as an entity for, although all are concerned with some aspect of mythology as applied to psychoanalysis, only a few adhere to the topic of "personal myth."

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.