Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from pepeasy.pep-web.org. You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:

On IOS:

  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Galatzer-Levy, R.M. (1994). Children, Bad Happenings, and Meanings. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 42:997-1000.

(1994). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 42:997-1000

Children, Bad Happenings, and Meanings

Robert M. Galatzer-Levy

DISCUSSIONS OF CHILDHOOD TRAUMA often focus on whether events actually occurred. Three papers in this issue of the Journal address this problem. Steele (1994) underlines that our appreciation of the impact of actual maltreatment of children has emerged only in the last three decades. Analysts, like the rest of society, denied the extent and severity of child abuse. Steele summarizes the range of findings that emerged with systematic attention to abuse. Person and Klar (1994) point to the importance of recognizing actual events and suggest that the analyst often can identify a history of such events on the basis of the adult's symptom. Brenneis (1994) recognizes how important it is for people who have been maltreated to be believed. But he emphasizes how consistently recent investigations show the power of suggestion in shaping patients' recollections. Still a question remains. Why is the question of the actuality of events so central in discussions of trauma?

Child analysts have long recognized that the meanings of dreadful occurrences for the child may be very different from what even the empathic observer might imagine. Bergen (1958) describes the impact on a four-year-old girl of witnessing her father murder her mother. Analysis revealed that the child attributed a wide range of oedipal and preoedipal meanings to this event. Just before her murder the mother, trying to protect the child, screamed, "Get out of here!" Only in analysis did it become apparent that the child was profoundly affected by what she understood as mother's attempt to angrily exclude the child from the parents' intimacy. Anna Freud (1958) laconically remarks, "I cannot help wondering whether—without analysis—it would have been the fate of this particular detail to be singled out for permanent traumatic significance" (p. 135).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.