Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To print an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To print an article, click on the small Printer Icon located at the top right corner of the page, or by pressing Ctrl + P. Remember, PEP-Web content is copyright.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Wallerstein, R.S. Coen, S.J. (1994). Impasses in Psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 42:1225-1235.

(1994). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 42:1225-1235

Impasses in Psychoanalysis

Robert S. Wallerstein, M.D. and Stanley J. Coen, M.D.

WALLERSTEIN CONNECTED THE NATURE of the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis with its obverse, the nature of obstacles to therapeutic change. Freud (1937) emphasized as impediments to therapeutic success: the severity of early trauma, the constitutional strength of the instincts, and ego alterations or deformations. Wallerstein indicated that our literature has attended far more to consideration of the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis than to the topic of this panel—our difficulties and failures. Treatment research has focused on constructive changes during treatment and on attempts to explore how such changes have been accomplished. Study of therapeutic action and intervention in psychoanalysis has attended primarily to treatment success rather than to analytic failure. Wallerstein pointed to a trend during the past 30 years away from emphasis on psychoanalytic cure, toward a more modest assessment of the potential for psychoanalytic treatment of effect change. Anna Freud's 1968 Freud Anniversary Lecture at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute encouraged analysts to learn from the "difficulties, obstacles, and setbacks" of analysis. Wallerstein praised Etchegoyen's (1991) discussion of impasses. Etchegoyen distinguishes between slow working through and arrested working through or genuine impasse. He considers three types of impasse: acting out ("anti-task") intended to obstruct remembering; negative therapeutic reaction ("anti-achievement") designed to undo analytic progress; anti-insight ("reversible perspective") aimed toward analytic misunderstanding. This last type of impasse is regarded as a will to misunderstand so as not to acquire insight and change; it reflects the patient's destructive attitude toward analysis.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.