Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To refine your search with the author’s first initial…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you get a large number of results after searching for an article by a specific author, you can refine your search by adding the author’s first initial. For example, try writing “Freud, S.” in the Author box of the Search Tool.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Roth, S. (1994). Cultivating Intuition: By Peter Lomas. Northvale, NJ: Aronson, 1993, 232 pp., $25.00.. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 42:1299-1300.

(1994). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 42:1299-1300

Cultivating Intuition: By Peter Lomas. Northvale, NJ: Aronson, 1993, 232 pp., $25.00.

Review by:
Sheldon Roth, M.D.

Cultivating Intuition is a candid glimpse into the mind and heart of a dedicated psychoanalyst struggling to separate the wheat of analytic psychotherapy from its chaff. Lomas's chatty, epigrammatic discussions weave back and forth between past and current psychoanalytic challenges, giving his philosophy a postmodern flavor of cut, patch, and paste whose text is loose, yet coherent. Some chapter headings are "The Attributes of the psychotherapist," "The Moral Stance of Psychotherapy," "The Analytic Attitude," "Formulations of Anguish," "Seduction," "Is Psychotherapy Real?" and "Ordinariness." The digressive prose mirrors the fluid openness of Lomas's therapeutic stance: "I find myself in sympathy with Ferenczi and those who emphasize the healing power of the relationship per se … what is most conducive to growth is the way in which the therapist relates to her [his] patient" (p. 110). After Freud, Winnicott has had the most profound impact on Lomas.

Lomas is highly critical of abstinence and frustration as therapeutic ploys, and believes that no interpretations take place in a disciplined, orderly way. Indeed, the adherence to teaching these techniques contributes toward years of frustration for neophyte analysts as they discover the limitations of neutrality: "It is dangerous to encourage a beginner to practice a method in which one does not really believe oneself" (p. 59). Neutrality is impossible, Lomas feels, because one's "morality" (i.e., philosophical and political views) has a direct bearing on one's therapeutic stance.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.