Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To save a shortcut to an article to your desktop…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The way you save a shortcut to an article on your desktop depends on what internet browser (and device) you are using.

  • Safari
  • Chrome
  • Internet Explorer
  • Opera

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Goldberger, M. (1995). Commentaries. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 43:360-365.

(1995). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 43:360-365

Commentaries

Marianne Goldberger

“Working through” is one of Freud's most evocative metaphors, as John Gedo has noted. But its use by Freud and its suggestiveness are not enough to justify its persistence in the psychoanalytic lexicon. I agree with Brenner (1987), who views the literature on working through, beginning with Freud, as a way to address the question, Why does analysis take so long? “Every analyst will agree,” remarked Brenner, “that analysis is slow work, but no one, to date, has given a satisfactory explanation of why it is slow work” (p. 101). Brenner emphasized the significant changes in our knowledge since the term's introduction in 1914: “Working through is not a regrettable delay in the process of analytic cure. It is analysis. … The analysis of psychic conflict in all of its aspects is what should properly be called working through” (p. 103).

It seems to me that working through is a rich, inviting metaphor for expressing what we do not exactly know, but why the term persists is another matter. Analysts have important reasons for wanting to keep a long-used, familiar vocabulary, even when it has lost its ability to define or explain. Rothstein (1980) has written persuasively about analysts' narcissistic investment in their traditional vocabulary: “Practicing analysts derive a sense of security and well-being from performing well within an established narcissistically invested paradigm. The ‘classical’ paradigm provides a framework wherein verbal interpretation, reconstruction and working through of an oedipal conflict and the associated infantile neurosis is most fulfilling to the analyst” (p.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.